• Toggle Accessibility Statement
  • Home
  • Skip to Main Content
  • Sitemap
Menu
SET
  • Home
    • History
    • Mission, Vision, Goal and Values
    • Proceedings Before the Tribunal
    • Interactive Timeline of Members
      • Current Members
      • Member Justices
      • Member Senators
    • Organization
  • Service Charter
    • Service Charter
    • Election Protest Flowchart
    • Petition for Quo Warranto Flowchart
  • Resolutions
    • SET Case No. 001-23, Licup-Pearson, et. al. vs. Tulfo
    • SET Case No. 002-19, Adan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-19, Mansilungan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-16, Tolentino vs. de Lima
    • SET Case No. 001-15, David vs. Poe-Llamanzares
  • SET Cases
    • SET Case No. 001-23, Licup-Pearson, et. al. vs. Tulfo
    • SET Case Nos. 001-19, Mansilungan vs. Pimentel III and 002-19, Adan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-16, Tolentino vs. de Lima
    • SET Case No. 001-15, David vs. Poe-Llamanzares
    • SET Case No. 001-07, Pimentel III vs. Zubiri
    • SET Case No. 001-04, Osmeña vs. Biazon et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-01, Enrile vs. Recto et. al.
    • SET Case No. 002-98, Lagman vs. Guingona et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-98, Pagdanganan vs. Aquino-Oreta
    • SET Case No. 001-95, Pimentel Jr. vs. Honasan et. al.
    • SET Case No. 003-92, Bengzon vs. Tañada et. al.
    • Undocketed, Arroyo vs. Webb
    • SET Case No. 002-92, Rasul vs. Webb et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-92, Osmeña vs. Webb
    • SET Case No. 002-87, Abbas et. al vs. Alvarez et. al
    • SET Case No. 001-87, Sanchez vs. Enrile et. al
  • Resources
    • SET Publications
    • Rules of the Tribunal
      • 2020 SET Rules
      • 2013 SET Rules
      • 1999 SET Rules
      • 1996 SET Rules
    • Revision Rules
      • Manual Election
      • Automated Election
      • Correction of Manifest Error
    • Philippine Constitutions
      • 1987 Constitution
      • 1973 Constitution
      • 1935 Constitution
    • US Bills
      • The Philippine Bill of 1902
      • The Jones Law of 1916
    • Revised Rules of Court
      • 2019 Proposed Amendments to the Revised Rules of Evidence
      • 2019 Proposed Amendments to the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure
      • Republic Act No. 8792
      • 2000 Rules of Criminal Procedure
      • 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure
      • 1989 Revised Rules on Evidence
      • 1988 Rules on Criminal Procedure
      • 1985 Rules on Criminal Procedure
      • 1964 Rules of Court
      • 1918 Rules of Court
      • Criminal Procedure of 1900
    • Rules on Electronic Evidence
    • Rules on DNA Evidence
    • Election Laws
      • Republic Act No. 9333
      • Republic Act No. 9189
      • Republic Act No. 9164
      • Republic Act No. 9369
      • Republic Act No. 9012
      • Republic Act No. 9006
      • Republic Act No. 8953
      • Republic Act No. 8753
      • Republic Act No. 8746
      • Republic Act No. 8436
      • Republic Act No. 8295
      • Republic Act No. 8189
      • Republic Act No. 8046
      • Republic Act No. 7491
      • COMELEC Rules of Procedure
      • Republic Act No. 7166
      • Republic Act No. 7056
      • Batas Pambansa Bilang 881
    • Downloadable Forms
  • Announcements
    • Request For Quotation
    • Invitation to Bid
    • Notice of Award
    • Notice of Vacancies
  • GAD
    • Mandates
    • Mission / Vision / Goals
    • GAD Focal Point System
    • GAD Activities
    • Sex Disaggregated Data of Parties in Election Contests Filed Before the SET
  • Contact Us
  • AUXILIARY MENU
  • SET
  • Home
    • History
    • Mission, Vision, Goal and Values
    • Proceedings Before the Tribunal
    • Interactive Timeline of Members
      • Current Members
      • Member Justices
      • Member Senators
    • Organization
  • Service Charter
    • Service Charter
    • Election Protest Flowchart
    • Petition for Quo Warranto Flowchart
  • Resolutions
    • SET Case No. 001-23, Licup-Pearson, et. al. vs. Tulfo
    • SET Case No. 002-19, Adan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-19, Mansilungan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-16, Tolentino vs. de Lima
    • SET Case No. 001-15, David vs. Poe-Llamanzares
  • SET Cases
    • SET Case No. 001-23, Licup-Pearson, et. al. vs. Tulfo
    • SET Case Nos. 001-19, Mansilungan vs. Pimentel III and 002-19, Adan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-16, Tolentino vs. de Lima
    • SET Case No. 001-15, David vs. Poe-Llamanzares
    • SET Case No. 001-07, Pimentel III vs. Zubiri
    • SET Case No. 001-04, Osmeña vs. Biazon et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-01, Enrile vs. Recto et. al.
    • SET Case No. 002-98, Lagman vs. Guingona et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-98, Pagdanganan vs. Aquino-Oreta
    • SET Case No. 001-95, Pimentel Jr. vs. Honasan et. al.
    • SET Case No. 003-92, Bengzon vs. Tañada et. al.
    • Undocketed, Arroyo vs. Webb
    • SET Case No. 002-92, Rasul vs. Webb et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-92, Osmeña vs. Webb
    • SET Case No. 002-87, Abbas et. al vs. Alvarez et. al
    • SET Case No. 001-87, Sanchez vs. Enrile et. al
  • Resources
    • SET Publications
    • Rules of the Tribunal
      • 2020 SET Rules
      • 2013 SET Rules
      • 1999 SET Rules
      • 1996 SET Rules
    • Revision Rules
      • Manual Election
      • Automated Election
      • Correction of Manifest Error
    • Philippine Constitutions
      • 1987 Constitution
      • 1973 Constitution
      • 1935 Constitution
    • US Bills
      • The Philippine Bill of 1902
      • The Jones Law of 1916
    • Revised Rules of Court
      • 2019 Proposed Amendments to the Revised Rules of Evidence
      • 2019 Proposed Amendments to the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure
      • Republic Act No. 8792
      • 2000 Rules of Criminal Procedure
      • 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure
      • 1989 Revised Rules on Evidence
      • 1988 Rules on Criminal Procedure
      • 1985 Rules on Criminal Procedure
      • 1964 Rules of Court
      • 1918 Rules of Court
      • Criminal Procedure of 1900
    • Rules on Electronic Evidence
    • Rules on DNA Evidence
    • Election Laws
      • Republic Act No. 9333
      • Republic Act No. 9189
      • Republic Act No. 9164
      • Republic Act No. 9369
      • Republic Act No. 9012
      • Republic Act No. 9006
      • Republic Act No. 8953
      • Republic Act No. 8753
      • Republic Act No. 8746
      • Republic Act No. 8436
      • Republic Act No. 8295
      • Republic Act No. 8189
      • Republic Act No. 8046
      • Republic Act No. 7491
      • COMELEC Rules of Procedure
      • Republic Act No. 7166
      • Republic Act No. 7056
      • Batas Pambansa Bilang 881
    • Downloadable Forms
  • Announcements
    • Request For Quotation
    • Invitation to Bid
    • Notice of Award
    • Notice of Vacancies
  • GAD
    • Mandates
    • Mission / Vision / Goals
    • GAD Focal Point System
    • GAD Activities
    • Sex Disaggregated Data of Parties in Election Contests Filed Before the SET
  • Contact Us
    • Accessibility Statement
    • High Contrast
    • Skip to Content
    • Skip to Footer

Republic of the Philippines

Senate Electoral Tribunal

Philippine Standard Time:

Member Justices

The Senate and the House of Representatives shall each have an Electoral Tribunal which shall be the sole judge of all contests relating to the election, returns, and qualifications of their respective Members. Each Electoral Tribunal shall be composed of nine Members, three of whom shall be Justices of the Supreme Court to be designated by the Chief Justice, and the remaining six shall be Members of the Senate or the House of Representatives, as the case may be, who shall be chosen on the basis of proportional representation from the political parties and the parties or organizations registered under the party-list system represented therein. The senior Justice in the Electoral Tribunal shall be its Chairman. – Section 17, Article VI, 1987 Constitution

  • Home >>
  •  Member Justices 

HON. JUSTICE MARVIC MARIO VICTOR F. LEONEN

Marvic M.V.F. Leonen is currently the Senior Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines. He is the Former continue reading : HON. JUSTICE MARVIC MARIO VICTOR F. LEONEN

HON. JUSTICE RAMON PAUL L. HERNANDO

Justice Ramon Paul L. Hernando was born in Tuguegarao City, Cagayan on August 27, 1966. His primary years of schooling, from continue reading : HON. JUSTICE RAMON PAUL L. HERNANDO

HON. JUSTICE HENRI JEAN PAUL B. INTING

Justice Henri Jean Paul B. Inting obtained his Bachelor of Laws degree from Ateneo de Davao University in 1982 where continue reading : HON. JUSTICE HENRI JEAN PAUL B. INTING

HON. JUSTICE ANTONIO T. CARPIO

Born in Davao City, Philippines, Justice Antonio T. Carpio was sworn in as member of the Supreme Court on October continue reading : HON. JUSTICE ANTONIO T. CARPIO

HON. JUSTICE ESTELA M. PERLAS-BERNABE

On September 16, 2011, the appointment of then Court of Appeals Justice Estela M. Perlas-Bernabe as Associate Justice of the continue reading : HON. JUSTICE ESTELA M. PERLAS-BERNABE

HON. JUSTICE ALFREDO BENJAMIN S. CAGUIOA

Justice Alfredo Benjamin Sabater Caguioa is the 174th Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. Prior to his appointment on January 22, continue reading : HON. JUSTICE ALFREDO BENJAMIN S. CAGUIOA

HON. JUSTICE AMY C. LAZARO-JAVIER

Associate Justice of the Supreme Court (From March 7, 2019 to date) Held the post of Associate Justice of the continue reading : HON. JUSTICE AMY C. LAZARO-JAVIER

HON. JUSTICE ROSMARI D. CARANDANG

Justice Rosmari D. Carandang was born in Ilog, Taal, Batangas, and a daughter of two public school teachers, Sixto and continue reading : HON. JUSTICE ROSMARI D. CARANDANG

HON. JUSTICE JOSE C. REYES, JR.

Hailing from Tacloban City, Leyte, Justice Jose Calayag Reyes, Jr. was appointed on August 9, 2018 as the 179th Associate Justice continue reading : HON. JUSTICE JOSE C. REYES, JR.

HON. JUSTICE ALEXANDER G. GESMUNDO

Justice Alexander G. Gesmundo was appointed to the Supreme Court as Associate Justice on August 14, 2017.  Previously, he was continue reading : HON. JUSTICE ALEXANDER G. GESMUNDO

Post navigation

← Older posts
SET Quick Survey
✕

Please help us find out what you think about the website.

Go to survey
  • Home
    • History
    • Mission, Vision, Goal and Values
    • Proceedings Before the Tribunal
    • Interactive Timeline of Members
    • Organization
  • Service Charter
    • Service Charter
    • Election Protest Flowchart
    • Petition for Quo Warranto Flowchart
  • Resolutions
    • SET Case No. 001-23, Licup-Pearson, et. al. vs. Tulfo
    • SET Case No. 002-19, Adan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-19, Mansilungan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-16, Tolentino vs. de Lima
    • SET Case No. 001-15, David vs. Poe-Llamanzares
  • SET Cases
    • SET Case No. 001-23, Licup-Pearson, et. al. vs. Tulfo
    • SET Case Nos. 001-19, Mansilungan vs. Pimentel III and 002-19, Adan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-16, Tolentino vs. de Lima
    • SET Case No. 001-15, David vs. Poe-Llamanzares
    • SET Case No. 001-07, Pimentel III vs. Zubiri
    • SET Case No. 001-04, Osmeña vs. Biazon et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-01, Enrile vs. Recto et. al.
    • SET Case No. 002-98, Lagman vs. Guingona et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-98, Pagdanganan vs. Aquino-Oreta
    • SET Case No. 001-95, Pimentel Jr. vs. Honasan et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-92, Osmeña vs. Webb
    • SET Case No. 003-92, Bengzon vs. Tañada et. al.
    • Undocketed, Arroyo vs. Webb
    • SET Case No. 002-92, Rasul vs. Webb et. al.
    • SET Case No. 002-87, Abbas et. al vs. Alvarez et. al
    • SET Case No. 001-87, Sanchez vs. Enrile et. al
  • Resources
    • SET Publications
    • Rules of the Tribunal
    • Revision Rules
    • Philippine Constitutions
    • US Bills
    • Revised Rules of Court
    • Rules on Electronic Evidence
    • Rules on DNA Evidence
    • Election Laws
    • Downloadable Forms
  • Announcements
    • Request For Quotation
    • Invitation to Bid
    • Notice of Award
    • Notice of Vacancies