• Toggle Accessibility Statement
  • Home
  • Skip to Main Content
  • Sitemap
Menu
SET
  • Home
    • History
    • Mission, Vision, Goal and Values
    • Proceedings Before the Tribunal
    • Interactive Timeline of Members
      • Current Members
      • Member Justices
      • Member Senators
    • Organization
  • Service Charter
    • Service Charter
    • Election Protest Flowchart
    • Petition for Quo Warranto Flowchart
  • Resolutions
    • SET Case No. 001-23, Licup-Pearson, et. al. vs. Tulfo
    • SET Case No. 002-19, Adan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-19, Mansilungan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-16, Tolentino vs. de Lima
    • SET Case No. 001-15, David vs. Poe-Llamanzares
  • SET Cases
    • SET Case No. 001-23, Licup-Pearson, et. al. vs. Tulfo
    • SET Case Nos. 001-19, Mansilungan vs. Pimentel III and 002-19, Adan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-16, Tolentino vs. de Lima
    • SET Case No. 001-15, David vs. Poe-Llamanzares
    • SET Case No. 001-07, Pimentel III vs. Zubiri
    • SET Case No. 001-04, Osmeña vs. Biazon et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-01, Enrile vs. Recto et. al.
    • SET Case No. 002-98, Lagman vs. Guingona et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-98, Pagdanganan vs. Aquino-Oreta
    • SET Case No. 001-95, Pimentel Jr. vs. Honasan et. al.
    • SET Case No. 003-92, Bengzon vs. Tañada et. al.
    • Undocketed, Arroyo vs. Webb
    • SET Case No. 002-92, Rasul vs. Webb et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-92, Osmeña vs. Webb
    • SET Case No. 002-87, Abbas et. al vs. Alvarez et. al
    • SET Case No. 001-87, Sanchez vs. Enrile et. al
  • Resources
    • SET Publications
    • Rules of the Tribunal
      • 2020 SET Rules
      • 2013 SET Rules
      • 1999 SET Rules
      • 1996 SET Rules
    • Revision Rules
      • Manual Election
      • Automated Election
      • Correction of Manifest Error
    • Philippine Constitutions
      • 1987 Constitution
      • 1973 Constitution
      • 1935 Constitution
    • US Bills
      • The Philippine Bill of 1902
      • The Jones Law of 1916
    • Revised Rules of Court
      • 2019 Proposed Amendments to the Revised Rules of Evidence
      • 2019 Proposed Amendments to the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure
      • Republic Act No. 8792
      • 2000 Rules of Criminal Procedure
      • 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure
      • 1989 Revised Rules on Evidence
      • 1988 Rules on Criminal Procedure
      • 1985 Rules on Criminal Procedure
      • 1964 Rules of Court
      • 1918 Rules of Court
      • Criminal Procedure of 1900
    • Rules on Electronic Evidence
    • Rules on DNA Evidence
    • Election Laws
      • Republic Act No. 9333
      • Republic Act No. 9189
      • Republic Act No. 9164
      • Republic Act No. 9369
      • Republic Act No. 9012
      • Republic Act No. 9006
      • Republic Act No. 8953
      • Republic Act No. 8753
      • Republic Act No. 8746
      • Republic Act No. 8436
      • Republic Act No. 8295
      • Republic Act No. 8189
      • Republic Act No. 8046
      • Republic Act No. 7491
      • COMELEC Rules of Procedure
      • Republic Act No. 7166
      • Republic Act No. 7056
      • Batas Pambansa Bilang 881
    • Downloadable Forms
  • Announcements
    • Request For Quotation
    • Invitation to Bid
    • Notice of Award
    • Notice of Vacancies
  • GAD
    • Mandates
    • Mission / Vision / Goals
    • GAD Focal Point System
    • GAD Activities
    • Sex Disaggregated Data of Parties in Election Contests Filed Before the SET
  • Contact Us
  • AUXILIARY MENU
  • SET
  • Home
    • History
    • Mission, Vision, Goal and Values
    • Proceedings Before the Tribunal
    • Interactive Timeline of Members
      • Current Members
      • Member Justices
      • Member Senators
    • Organization
  • Service Charter
    • Service Charter
    • Election Protest Flowchart
    • Petition for Quo Warranto Flowchart
  • Resolutions
    • SET Case No. 001-23, Licup-Pearson, et. al. vs. Tulfo
    • SET Case No. 002-19, Adan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-19, Mansilungan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-16, Tolentino vs. de Lima
    • SET Case No. 001-15, David vs. Poe-Llamanzares
  • SET Cases
    • SET Case No. 001-23, Licup-Pearson, et. al. vs. Tulfo
    • SET Case Nos. 001-19, Mansilungan vs. Pimentel III and 002-19, Adan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-16, Tolentino vs. de Lima
    • SET Case No. 001-15, David vs. Poe-Llamanzares
    • SET Case No. 001-07, Pimentel III vs. Zubiri
    • SET Case No. 001-04, Osmeña vs. Biazon et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-01, Enrile vs. Recto et. al.
    • SET Case No. 002-98, Lagman vs. Guingona et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-98, Pagdanganan vs. Aquino-Oreta
    • SET Case No. 001-95, Pimentel Jr. vs. Honasan et. al.
    • SET Case No. 003-92, Bengzon vs. Tañada et. al.
    • Undocketed, Arroyo vs. Webb
    • SET Case No. 002-92, Rasul vs. Webb et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-92, Osmeña vs. Webb
    • SET Case No. 002-87, Abbas et. al vs. Alvarez et. al
    • SET Case No. 001-87, Sanchez vs. Enrile et. al
  • Resources
    • SET Publications
    • Rules of the Tribunal
      • 2020 SET Rules
      • 2013 SET Rules
      • 1999 SET Rules
      • 1996 SET Rules
    • Revision Rules
      • Manual Election
      • Automated Election
      • Correction of Manifest Error
    • Philippine Constitutions
      • 1987 Constitution
      • 1973 Constitution
      • 1935 Constitution
    • US Bills
      • The Philippine Bill of 1902
      • The Jones Law of 1916
    • Revised Rules of Court
      • 2019 Proposed Amendments to the Revised Rules of Evidence
      • 2019 Proposed Amendments to the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure
      • Republic Act No. 8792
      • 2000 Rules of Criminal Procedure
      • 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure
      • 1989 Revised Rules on Evidence
      • 1988 Rules on Criminal Procedure
      • 1985 Rules on Criminal Procedure
      • 1964 Rules of Court
      • 1918 Rules of Court
      • Criminal Procedure of 1900
    • Rules on Electronic Evidence
    • Rules on DNA Evidence
    • Election Laws
      • Republic Act No. 9333
      • Republic Act No. 9189
      • Republic Act No. 9164
      • Republic Act No. 9369
      • Republic Act No. 9012
      • Republic Act No. 9006
      • Republic Act No. 8953
      • Republic Act No. 8753
      • Republic Act No. 8746
      • Republic Act No. 8436
      • Republic Act No. 8295
      • Republic Act No. 8189
      • Republic Act No. 8046
      • Republic Act No. 7491
      • COMELEC Rules of Procedure
      • Republic Act No. 7166
      • Republic Act No. 7056
      • Batas Pambansa Bilang 881
    • Downloadable Forms
  • Announcements
    • Request For Quotation
    • Invitation to Bid
    • Notice of Award
    • Notice of Vacancies
  • GAD
    • Mandates
    • Mission / Vision / Goals
    • GAD Focal Point System
    • GAD Activities
    • Sex Disaggregated Data of Parties in Election Contests Filed Before the SET
  • Contact Us
    • Accessibility Statement
    • High Contrast
    • Skip to Content
    • Skip to Footer

Republic of the Philippines

Senate Electoral Tribunal

Philippine Standard Time:

Current Members

The Senate and the House of Representatives shall each have an Electoral Tribunal which shall be the sole judge of all contests relating to the election, returns, and qualifications of their respective Members. Each Electoral Tribunal shall be composed of nine Members, three of whom shall be Justices of the Supreme Court to be designated by the Chief Justice, and the remaining six shall be Members of the Senate or the House of Representatives, as the case may be, who shall be chosen on the basis of proportional representation from the political parties and the parties or organizations registered under the party-list system represented therein. The senior Justice in the Electoral Tribunal shall be its Chairman. – Section 17, Article VI, 1987 Constitution

  • Home >>
  •  Current Members 

HON. JUSTICE MARVIC MARIO VICTOR F. LEONEN

EducationLL.M, Columbia University, New York (2004)LL.B, University of the Philippines (1987)(Signed Roll of Attorneys, May 28, 1988)LL.B, University of the continue reading : HON. JUSTICE MARVIC MARIO VICTOR F. LEONEN

HON. JUSTICE RAMON PAUL L. HERNANDO

Justice Ramon Paul L. Hernando was born in Tuguegarao City, Cagayan on August 27, 1966. His primary years of schooling, from continue reading : HON. JUSTICE RAMON PAUL L. HERNANDO

HON. JUSTICE HENRI JEAN PAUL B. INTING

Justice Henri Jean Paul B. Inting obtained his Bachelor of Laws degree from Ateneo de Davao University in 1982 where continue reading : HON. JUSTICE HENRI JEAN PAUL B. INTING

HON. SENATOR MANUEL M. LAPID

The six years of his first term as a senator were marked with achievements which left the cynics perplexed and continue reading : HON. SENATOR MANUEL M. LAPID

HON. SENATOR PIA S. CAYETANO

Pinay In Action Senator Pia S. Cayetano has built a track record for getting the tough job done. For nearly continue reading : HON. SENATOR PIA S. CAYETANO

HON. SENATOR MARIA LOURDES “NANCY” SOMBILLO BINAY

Senator Maria Lourdes Nancy Sombillo Binay is the chairperson of the Senate Committees on Tourism, Cultural Communities, and Social Justice, continue reading : HON. SENATOR MARIA LOURDES “NANCY” SOMBILLO BINAY

HON. SENATOR IMEE R. MARCOS

Senate Office: Rooms 519 & 15 (Extension)GSIS Bldg., Financial Center, Diokno Blvd., Pasay CityTrunk Lines: (632) 8-552-6601 to 70 local nos. continue reading : HON. SENATOR IMEE R. MARCOS

HON. SENATOR JOSEPH VICTOR G. EJERCITO

Senator Joseph Victor G. Ejercito was born on December 26, 1969 in Manila. He is the son of former San continue reading : HON. SENATOR JOSEPH VICTOR G. EJERCITO

HON. SENATOR ROBINHOOD C. PADILLA

“Kailangan hindi ka lang action hero sa pelikula. ‘Pag sinabi na action hero ka, kahit sa totoong buhay.” Ito ang continue reading : HON. SENATOR ROBINHOOD C. PADILLA

SET Quick Survey
✕

Please help us find out what you think about the website.

Go to survey
  • Home
    • History
    • Mission, Vision, Goal and Values
    • Proceedings Before the Tribunal
    • Interactive Timeline of Members
    • Organization
  • Service Charter
    • Service Charter
    • Election Protest Flowchart
    • Petition for Quo Warranto Flowchart
  • Resolutions
    • SET Case No. 001-23, Licup-Pearson, et. al. vs. Tulfo
    • SET Case No. 002-19, Adan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-19, Mansilungan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-16, Tolentino vs. de Lima
    • SET Case No. 001-15, David vs. Poe-Llamanzares
  • SET Cases
    • SET Case No. 001-23, Licup-Pearson, et. al. vs. Tulfo
    • SET Case Nos. 001-19, Mansilungan vs. Pimentel III and 002-19, Adan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-16, Tolentino vs. de Lima
    • SET Case No. 001-15, David vs. Poe-Llamanzares
    • SET Case No. 001-07, Pimentel III vs. Zubiri
    • SET Case No. 001-04, Osmeña vs. Biazon et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-01, Enrile vs. Recto et. al.
    • SET Case No. 002-98, Lagman vs. Guingona et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-98, Pagdanganan vs. Aquino-Oreta
    • SET Case No. 001-95, Pimentel Jr. vs. Honasan et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-92, Osmeña vs. Webb
    • SET Case No. 003-92, Bengzon vs. Tañada et. al.
    • Undocketed, Arroyo vs. Webb
    • SET Case No. 002-92, Rasul vs. Webb et. al.
    • SET Case No. 002-87, Abbas et. al vs. Alvarez et. al
    • SET Case No. 001-87, Sanchez vs. Enrile et. al
  • Resources
    • SET Publications
    • Rules of the Tribunal
    • Revision Rules
    • Philippine Constitutions
    • US Bills
    • Revised Rules of Court
    • Rules on Electronic Evidence
    • Rules on DNA Evidence
    • Election Laws
    • Downloadable Forms
  • Announcements
    • Request For Quotation
    • Invitation to Bid
    • Notice of Award
    • Notice of Vacancies