• Toggle Accessibility Statement
  • Home
  • Skip to Main Content
  • Sitemap
Menu
SET
  • Home
    • History
    • Mission, Vision, Goal and Values
    • Proceedings Before the Tribunal
    • Interactive Timeline of Members
      • Current Members
      • Member Justices
      • Member Senators
    • Organization
  • Service Charter
    • Service Charter
    • Election Protest Flowchart
    • Petition for Quo Warranto Flowchart
  • Resolutions
    • SET Case No. 001-23, Licup-Pearson, et. al. vs. Tulfo
    • SET Case No. 002-19, Adan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-19, Mansilungan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-16, Tolentino vs. de Lima
    • SET Case No. 001-15, David vs. Poe-Llamanzares
  • SET Cases
    • SET Case No. 001-23, Licup-Pearson, et. al. vs. Tulfo
    • SET Case Nos. 001-19, Mansilungan vs. Pimentel III and 002-19, Adan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-16, Tolentino vs. de Lima
    • SET Case No. 001-15, David vs. Poe-Llamanzares
    • SET Case No. 001-07, Pimentel III vs. Zubiri
    • SET Case No. 001-04, Osmeña vs. Biazon et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-01, Enrile vs. Recto et. al.
    • SET Case No. 002-98, Lagman vs. Guingona et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-98, Pagdanganan vs. Aquino-Oreta
    • SET Case No. 001-95, Pimentel Jr. vs. Honasan et. al.
    • SET Case No. 003-92, Bengzon vs. Tañada et. al.
    • Undocketed, Arroyo vs. Webb
    • SET Case No. 002-92, Rasul vs. Webb et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-92, Osmeña vs. Webb
    • SET Case No. 002-87, Abbas et. al vs. Alvarez et. al
    • SET Case No. 001-87, Sanchez vs. Enrile et. al
  • Resources
    • SET Publications
    • Rules of the Tribunal
      • 2020 SET Rules
      • 2013 SET Rules
      • 1999 SET Rules
      • 1996 SET Rules
    • Revision Rules
      • Manual Election
      • Automated Election
      • Correction of Manifest Error
    • Philippine Constitutions
      • 1987 Constitution
      • 1973 Constitution
      • 1935 Constitution
    • US Bills
      • The Philippine Bill of 1902
      • The Jones Law of 1916
    • Revised Rules of Court
      • 2019 Proposed Amendments to the Revised Rules of Evidence
      • 2019 Proposed Amendments to the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure
      • Republic Act No. 8792
      • 2000 Rules of Criminal Procedure
      • 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure
      • 1989 Revised Rules on Evidence
      • 1988 Rules on Criminal Procedure
      • 1985 Rules on Criminal Procedure
      • 1964 Rules of Court
      • 1918 Rules of Court
      • Criminal Procedure of 1900
    • Rules on Electronic Evidence
    • Rules on DNA Evidence
    • Election Laws
      • Republic Act No. 9333
      • Republic Act No. 9189
      • Republic Act No. 9164
      • Republic Act No. 9369
      • Republic Act No. 9012
      • Republic Act No. 9006
      • Republic Act No. 8953
      • Republic Act No. 8753
      • Republic Act No. 8746
      • Republic Act No. 8436
      • Republic Act No. 8295
      • Republic Act No. 8189
      • Republic Act No. 8046
      • Republic Act No. 7491
      • COMELEC Rules of Procedure
      • Republic Act No. 7166
      • Republic Act No. 7056
      • Batas Pambansa Bilang 881
    • Downloadable Forms
  • Announcements
    • Request For Quotation
    • Invitation to Bid
    • Notices, Contracts, BAC Resolution
    • Bidding Documents
    • Notice of Vacancies
  • GAD
    • Mandates
    • Mission / Vision / Goals
    • GAD Focal Point System
    • GAD Activities
    • Sex Disaggregated Data of Parties in Election Contests Filed Before the SET
  • Contact Us
  • AUXILIARY MENU
  • SET
  • Home
    • History
    • Mission, Vision, Goal and Values
    • Proceedings Before the Tribunal
    • Interactive Timeline of Members
      • Current Members
      • Member Justices
      • Member Senators
    • Organization
  • Service Charter
    • Service Charter
    • Election Protest Flowchart
    • Petition for Quo Warranto Flowchart
  • Resolutions
    • SET Case No. 001-23, Licup-Pearson, et. al. vs. Tulfo
    • SET Case No. 002-19, Adan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-19, Mansilungan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-16, Tolentino vs. de Lima
    • SET Case No. 001-15, David vs. Poe-Llamanzares
  • SET Cases
    • SET Case No. 001-23, Licup-Pearson, et. al. vs. Tulfo
    • SET Case Nos. 001-19, Mansilungan vs. Pimentel III and 002-19, Adan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-16, Tolentino vs. de Lima
    • SET Case No. 001-15, David vs. Poe-Llamanzares
    • SET Case No. 001-07, Pimentel III vs. Zubiri
    • SET Case No. 001-04, Osmeña vs. Biazon et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-01, Enrile vs. Recto et. al.
    • SET Case No. 002-98, Lagman vs. Guingona et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-98, Pagdanganan vs. Aquino-Oreta
    • SET Case No. 001-95, Pimentel Jr. vs. Honasan et. al.
    • SET Case No. 003-92, Bengzon vs. Tañada et. al.
    • Undocketed, Arroyo vs. Webb
    • SET Case No. 002-92, Rasul vs. Webb et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-92, Osmeña vs. Webb
    • SET Case No. 002-87, Abbas et. al vs. Alvarez et. al
    • SET Case No. 001-87, Sanchez vs. Enrile et. al
  • Resources
    • SET Publications
    • Rules of the Tribunal
      • 2020 SET Rules
      • 2013 SET Rules
      • 1999 SET Rules
      • 1996 SET Rules
    • Revision Rules
      • Manual Election
      • Automated Election
      • Correction of Manifest Error
    • Philippine Constitutions
      • 1987 Constitution
      • 1973 Constitution
      • 1935 Constitution
    • US Bills
      • The Philippine Bill of 1902
      • The Jones Law of 1916
    • Revised Rules of Court
      • 2019 Proposed Amendments to the Revised Rules of Evidence
      • 2019 Proposed Amendments to the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure
      • Republic Act No. 8792
      • 2000 Rules of Criminal Procedure
      • 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure
      • 1989 Revised Rules on Evidence
      • 1988 Rules on Criminal Procedure
      • 1985 Rules on Criminal Procedure
      • 1964 Rules of Court
      • 1918 Rules of Court
      • Criminal Procedure of 1900
    • Rules on Electronic Evidence
    • Rules on DNA Evidence
    • Election Laws
      • Republic Act No. 9333
      • Republic Act No. 9189
      • Republic Act No. 9164
      • Republic Act No. 9369
      • Republic Act No. 9012
      • Republic Act No. 9006
      • Republic Act No. 8953
      • Republic Act No. 8753
      • Republic Act No. 8746
      • Republic Act No. 8436
      • Republic Act No. 8295
      • Republic Act No. 8189
      • Republic Act No. 8046
      • Republic Act No. 7491
      • COMELEC Rules of Procedure
      • Republic Act No. 7166
      • Republic Act No. 7056
      • Batas Pambansa Bilang 881
    • Downloadable Forms
  • Announcements
    • Request For Quotation
    • Invitation to Bid
    • Notices, Contracts, BAC Resolution
    • Bidding Documents
    • Notice of Vacancies
  • GAD
    • Mandates
    • Mission / Vision / Goals
    • GAD Focal Point System
    • GAD Activities
    • Sex Disaggregated Data of Parties in Election Contests Filed Before the SET
  • Contact Us
    • Accessibility Statement
    • High Contrast
    • Skip to Content
    • Skip to Footer

Republic of the Philippines

Senate Electoral Tribunal

Philippine Standard Time:

Author: Regina Abellanosa

  • Home >>
  • Author Archive

SET Awards Employee for Exemplary Attendance

The Senate Electoral Tribunal awarded the Administrative Commendation for Attendance for CY 2013 to POMPEYO S. LUAGUE, Legislative Staff Assistant III. continue reading : SET Awards Employee for Exemplary Attendance

SET Awarded Level II PRIME-HRM Agency Status

  The Senate Electoral Tribunal was awarded by the Civil Service Commission (CSC) with Level II PRIME-HRM Agency Status, in recognition of continue reading : SET Awarded Level II PRIME-HRM Agency Status

Conflict Management Training for Senate Electoral Tribunal Key Personnel

“All war is a symptom of man’s failure as a thinking animal.” ― John Steinbeck On October 02-03, 2013, management continue reading : Conflict Management Training for Senate Electoral Tribunal Key Personnel

SET Chosen by COA as One of this Year’s Outstanding Accounting Offices

In recognition of the quality, timeliness and accuracy of its FY 2012 Financial Reports, the Senate Electoral Tribunal was chosen continue reading : SET Chosen by COA as One of this Year’s Outstanding Accounting Offices

The Senate Electoral Tribunal Launches New Website

MANILA –The Senate Electoral Tribunal (SET) launches its new website (www.set.gov.ph) on September 12, 2013. The website contains Tribunal information such continue reading : The Senate Electoral Tribunal Launches New Website

SET Case No. 001-16 (Tolentino vs. de Lima): Opening of ballot boxes for purposes of Revision

After the retrieval of substantial number of ballots boxes, the Tribunal, in Resolution No. 16-65 dated 14 September 2017, directed continue reading : SET Case No. 001-16 (Tolentino vs. de Lima): Opening of ballot boxes for purposes of Revision

SET Case No. 001-16 (Tolentino vs. de Lima): Decryption of Secure Digital (SD) Cards

Upon motion of Protestant Tolentino, the Tribunal, in Resolution No. 16-89 dated 17 January 2018, required the Election Records and continue reading : SET Case No. 001-16 (Tolentino vs. de Lima): Decryption of Secure Digital (SD) Cards

Set Employee Commended For Exemplary Attendance

Ms. LORIBELLE S. SABANAL, Legislative Staff Officer IV of the Canvass Board Service, was the recipient of the Administrative Commendation continue reading : Set Employee Commended For Exemplary Attendance

SET Officers Undergo Training on Coaching and Mentoring

On May 06 and 07, 2015, the Secretary, Directors, Acting Directors, Officers-in-Charge and Supervisors of the Senate Electoral Tribunal (SET) continue reading : SET Officers Undergo Training on Coaching and Mentoring

SET Hosts CSC-NCR Field Office 3rd Quarter Cluster Meeting

The Senate Electoral Tribunal (SET) hosted the 3rd Quarter Cluster Meeting of the Civil Service Commission–National Capital Region (CSC-NCR) Field continue reading : SET Hosts CSC-NCR Field Office 3rd Quarter Cluster Meeting

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →
SET Quick Survey
✕

Please help us find out what you think about the website.

Go to survey
  • Home
    • History
    • Mission, Vision, Goal and Values
    • Proceedings Before the Tribunal
    • Interactive Timeline of Members
    • Organization
  • Service Charter
    • Service Charter
    • Election Protest Flowchart
    • Petition for Quo Warranto Flowchart
  • Resolutions
    • SET Case No. 001-23, Licup-Pearson, et. al. vs. Tulfo
    • SET Case No. 002-19, Adan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-19, Mansilungan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-16, Tolentino vs. de Lima
    • SET Case No. 001-15, David vs. Poe-Llamanzares
  • SET Cases
    • SET Case No. 001-23, Licup-Pearson, et. al. vs. Tulfo
    • SET Case Nos. 001-19, Mansilungan vs. Pimentel III and 002-19, Adan vs. Pimentel III
    • SET Case No. 001-16, Tolentino vs. de Lima
    • SET Case No. 001-15, David vs. Poe-Llamanzares
    • SET Case No. 001-07, Pimentel III vs. Zubiri
    • SET Case No. 001-04, Osmeña vs. Biazon et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-01, Enrile vs. Recto et. al.
    • SET Case No. 002-98, Lagman vs. Guingona et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-98, Pagdanganan vs. Aquino-Oreta
    • SET Case No. 001-95, Pimentel Jr. vs. Honasan et. al.
    • SET Case No. 001-92, Osmeña vs. Webb
    • SET Case No. 003-92, Bengzon vs. Tañada et. al.
    • Undocketed, Arroyo vs. Webb
    • SET Case No. 002-92, Rasul vs. Webb et. al.
    • SET Case No. 002-87, Abbas et. al vs. Alvarez et. al
    • SET Case No. 001-87, Sanchez vs. Enrile et. al
  • Resources
    • SET Publications
    • Rules of the Tribunal
    • Revision Rules
    • Philippine Constitutions
    • US Bills
    • Revised Rules of Court
    • Rules on Electronic Evidence
    • Rules on DNA Evidence
    • Election Laws
    • Downloadable Forms
  • Announcements
    • Request For Quotation
    • Invitation to Bid
    • Notices, Contracts, BAC Resolution
    • Bidding Documents
    • Notice of Vacancies